Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Analytic Element Method in Modeling Groundwater Flow
Brainerd, Minnesota
16–19 April 2000
Host: Department of Civil Engineering, University of Minnesota
Organizing Committee
  • Dr. O.D.L. Strack, Chair, University of Minnesota
  • Dr. R.J. Barnes, University of Minnesota
  • Dr. W.J. de Lange, RIZA, the Netherlands
  • Dr. I. Jankovic, University of Minnesota
  • Dr. S. Kraemer, USEPA
  • Mr. P. Le Grand, Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Saint-Étienne
  • Dr. J. Lehr, Environmental Education Enterprises, Inc.
Technical Committee
  • Dr. M. Bakker, University of Nebraska
  • Dr. R.J. Barnes, University of Minnesota
  • Dr. H.M. Haitjema, Indiana University
  • Dr. I. Jankovic, University of Minnesota
  • Dr. D.R. Steward, Kansas State University
  • Dr. O.D.L. Strack, University of Minnesota
  • Dr. A. Verruijt, Delft University of Technology
User Interface Design
  • ArcFlow: an interface between ArcView and Split program for modeling groundwater flow.
        J. Blum, B. Johnson, R. Soule, Minnesota Department of Health; I. Jankovic, University of Minnesota
  • MLAEM graphical user interface.
        O.D.L. Strack, University of Minnesota; O.E. Strack, Delft University of Technology
  • Working with WhAEM: analytic element modeling as if people mattered.
        S. Kraemer, U.S. EPA; V. Kelson, South Florida Water Management District; H. Haitjema, Indiana University
AEM Theory 1
  • Curvilinear elements of Bézier spline shape.
        Ph. Le Grand, Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Saint-Étienne; R. Barnes, University of Minnesota
  • The geometry of surfaces in divergence-free flow.
        D. Steward, Kansas State University
  • The singular behavior near the endpoint of a semi-confining boundary in the vertical plane.
        R. Pennings, GME Consultants, Inc.
Applied Mathematics
  • Analytic elements involving the Robin and refraction boundary conditions.
        A. Kacimov, Sultan Qaboos University, Oman; Y. Obnosov, Kazan University, Russia
  • An Analytic Element Method for multiple circular elastic inclusions.
        S. Mogilevskaya, S. Crouch, University of Minnesota
  • Coupled partial differential equations.
        E. Veling, Delft University of Technology
Regional Models
  • Some experiences with VARELS in MLAEM encountered in regional modeling of the central lakes area in the Netherlands for WINBOS, 1999.
        K. van Vliet, W. de Lange, RIZA, the Netherlands
  • Modeling regional inter-aquifer leakage in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Groundwater Model.
        J. Seaberg, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency; D. Hansen, University of Minnesota
  • Analytical Element Modeling of groundwater flow in anisotropic aquifers.
        M. Zaluski, M. Moe, MSE Technology Applications, Inc., Montana
  • Comparison of the uncertainty of a manually calibrated analytical element model with the uncertainty of the same model calibrated automatically.
        J. Moorman, Amsterdam Water Supply, the Netherlands
Comparison of Techniques
  • Numerical versus analytic modelling for hydrogeological applications.
        D. Graillot, P. Le Grand, Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Saint-Étienne
  • Only a matter of resolution.
        H. Haitjema, Indiana University; V. Kelson, South Florida Water Management District
  • Advective transport experiments carried out using MODFLOW in comparison with analytic solutions for three-dimensional groundwater flow.
        I. Jankovic, University of Minnesota
Keynote
  • Logic in groundwater modeling.
        M. McDonald, McDonald Morrissey Associates, Inc.
Modeling 1
  • The cost and benefits of modeling complexity: a case study comparing analytic element and numerical models from a proposed mine in northern Wisconsin, USA.
        R. Hunt, C. Carlson, J. Krohelski, U.S. Geological Survey; V. Kelson, South Florida Water Management District; H. Haitjema, Indiana University
  • Capture zone delineation: are simple methods adequate?
        A. Ceric, H. Haitjema, Indiana University
  • Reduction of transient head data under multiple influences.
        B. Power, Natural Resource Engineering Company
Modeling 2
  • Modeling flow in heterogeneous single fractures using AEM.
        M. Spiller, W. Hamelmann, R. Ababou, J. Köngeter, Aachen University of Technology; G. Demny, Institute of Fluid Mechanics, Toulouse
  • Step-wise approach to groundwater flow modeling using analytic element and finite-difference codes.
        D. Kaludjerovic, IAH, Waterloo, Canada
  • Integrating storm water modeling, GIS, and AEM modeling in Washington County, Minnesota.
        S. Grubb, J. Swenson, Emmons and Olivier Resources, Minnesota
Flow in the Vertical Plane
  • Simulating the interchange between surface water and groundwater through the unsaturated zone using a one-dimensional, steady model.
        R. Mollah, D. Steward, Kansas State University
  • The method of images for leaky boundaries.
        E. Anderson, Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc., Wisconsin
  • Groundwater flow under a water divide.
        A. Verruijt, Delft University of Technology
Keynote
  • Future development in the Analytic Element Method: Ten Challenges.
        Dr. O.D.L. Strack, University of Minnesota
AEM Theory 2
  • A new look at area sinks.
        R. Miller, R. Barnes, University of Minnesota; P. Le Grand, Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Saint-Étienne
  • Line elements for leakage.
        O.D.L. Strack, University of Minnesota
  • Exact solution for an elliptical inhomogeneity with a well.
        W. Olsen, Dakota County Environmental Management, Minnesota
Transport
  • Hysteresis in the sorption and desorption of radionuclides: Experimental data, analytical and numerical description.
        V. Rumynin, Institute for Environmental Geology, St. Petersburg State University, Russia
  • Detailed model of transport of pollutants from contaminated silt at the bottom of a surface water in a regional model including calibration on hydro-chemically determined traveltimes.
        W. de Lange, K. van Vliet, RIZA, the Netherlands
  • Advective Mixing.
        I. Jankovic, R. Barnes, University of Minnesota; D. Steward, Kansas State University
Leakage
  • Steady drawdown due to a well in a multiple aquifer system near a fault.
        K. Maas, Delft University of Technology
  • One-dimensional multi-layer analytic element model using matrix functions, with applications.
        T. Olsthoorn, Amsterdam Water Supply
  • Distribution and jumps in leakage and leakage gradient.
        O.D.L. Strack, University of Minnesota
  • Modeling wells in multi-layer and multi-aquifer systems.
        M. Bakker, University of Nebraska
3D Modeling
  • Analytic modelling of complex wells.
        P. Egberts, P. Fokker, Netherlands Institute of Applied Geoscience TNO
  • Gaining and Losing Sections of Horizontal Wells.
        W. Jin, D. Steward, Kansas State University
  • 3D wedge with a well.
        G. Bruggeman, retired
Object Oriented AEM
  • The Java Analytic Element Model: designing and implementing an object-oriented AEM code implementation.
        M. Bakker, University of Nebraska; V. Kelson, South Florida Water Management District
  • Key design elements in an object oriented approach to programming analytic elements; suggestions based on programming experience with MLAEM.
        O.E. Strack, Delft University of Technology
Posters
  • GFLOW.
        H. Haitjema, Indiana University
  • Philip's cavity in unsaturated conditions: three flow regimes.
        A. Kacimov, Sultan Qaboos University, Oman
  • Working with WhAEM: analytic element modeling as if people mattered.
        S. Kraemer, U.S. EPA; V. Kelson, South Florida Water Management District; H. Haitjema, Indiana University
  • Legendre functions for 2D groundwater flow modelling.
        P. Le Grand, Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Saint-Étienne
  • A Capture Zone Analysis for Valparaiso, IN: WhAEM vs. MODFLOW.
        K. Luther, Valparaiso University, Indiana
  • Dealing with partial penetration in a classic analytic or numerical model using a very detailed finite-difference model for axially symmetric flow.
        J. Moorman, Amsterdam Water Supply, the Netherlands
  • Determination of a 3-dimensional capture zone about a partially penetrating well – a simple analytic tool.
        B. Power, Natural Resource Engineering Company
  • Use of the Metropolitan Area Groundwater Model as a groundwater management tool in the Twin Cities area.
        J. Seaberg, A. Streitz, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency; D. Hansen, University of Minnesota